Part III of the Indian Constitution is where the country’s fundamental rights are written down. People believe that these rights are important for their growth and well-being, and they are supposed to protect their dignity, freedom, and equality. The following basic rights are protected by the Constitution of India:
1.Right to Equality (Articles 14–18): Makes sure that everyone is treated equally before the law and forbids prejudice based on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. It also makes sure that everyone is treated equally by the law and bans any kind of untouchability or titles of royalty.
2.Right to Freedom (Articles 19–22): Gives Indian people a number of freedoms, such as the freedom to speak and write, gather, join groups, move around, and live where they want. It also includes the freedom to work in any job, trade, business, or career.
3.Right against Exploitation (Articles 23 and 24): This bans the trade of people and forced labor (Article 23), and it also bans child labor (Article 24).
4.Right to Freedom of faith (Articles 25–28): This guarantees freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice, and spread any faith. It also protects people from different religions and cultures.
5.Cultural and Educational Rights (Articles 29-30): Protects the cultural, linguistic, and educational rights of minorities.
6.Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32): This makes sure that people can go to the Supreme Court of India to have their basic rights protected. This right is called the “heart and soul” of the Indian Constitution because it lets people go to court if their basic rights are violated.
These basic rights are not absolute; they can be limited in some sensible ways to protect public order, morality, security, and India’s sovereignty and integrity. But the Constitution says that any rule or action that goes against these basic rights can be thrown out by the courts.
It’s important to remember that only Indian citizens have access to basic rights. Foreigners and other people who are not citizens do not have these rights. The Constitution also protects the interests of tribal groups and people who are less fortunate by making exceptions and special rules for them.
[…] Constitution. At one time, these tasks were not included in the Indian Constitution. The list of fundamental rights and duties, as well as the Directive Principles of State Policy, are both portions of the Indian […]
[…] category of rights known as “fundamental rights” are those that the Indian Constitution’s Part III guarantees to all of the […]
[…] may seem notably out of place in a constitution that claims to be founded on democracy and fundamental rights. However, the provision must be examined in light of India’s history. India had her in its […]
[…] case, the issues at stake were whether or not the modification constituted a law and whether or not Fundamental Rights could be modified. The Supreme Court ruled that Article 13’s restriction on parliament does […]
[…] ARTICLE 13 – The highest court may question any statute that infringes on a fundamental right. […]
[…] (reservations) for Dalits and other marginalized groups in education and employment, and guaranteed fundamental rights to all […]
[…] its enshrinement of fundamental rights that enable Indian citizens to express their thoughts, gather in peace, and actively participate in […]
[…] 1950 grants citizens the Fundamental Right to the Protection of Life and Personal Liberty. These Fundamental Rights are granted against state activities, which means that no act by any state authority can infringe […]
[…] 4.Fundamental Rights: The Constitution gives its people a number of fundamental rights, such as the right to equality, the right to free speech and expression, the right to life and personal freedom, the right not to be exploited, and the right to religious freedom. […]
[…] saw the promulgation of Article 29 on April 26. Article 29 is found in Chapter 3’s “Fundamental Rights” section, which is covered by the Department of Personnel and Administrative […]
[…] its complexity and difficulties. The Parliament must find a careful balance between upholding fundamental rights, the ideals of equality and non-discrimination, and maintaining national security and inclusivity. […]
[…] Directive Principles of State Policy, including Article 38, are not enforceable by courts, unlike Fundamental Rights. However, they act as a moral and ethical guidepost for the government in making policies and […]
[…] The Indian Constitution‘s Article 24, a cornerstone of the country’s legal system, serves as a potent guarantee for the rights and welfare of its youngest inhabitants. This important item covers the subject of child labor and is included in Part III of the Constitution, which is concerned with Fundamental Rights. […]
[…] or restriction that prevents or lessens the recognition, enjoyment, or exercise of women’s fundamental rights and human […]
[…] signifies their unwavering commitment to safeguarding the democratic principles, protecting the fundamental rights of citizens, and upholding the rule of […]
[…] law that is in conflict with the Fundamental Rights is presumed to be illegal or invalid to the extent of such conflict under the Indian Constitution. […]
[…] establishing an efficient system for their enforcement, should they be infringed, a proclamation of fundamental rights in the Constitution is meaningless, useless, and worthless. Therefore, Article 32 grants the right […]
[…] of Fundamental Rights: Writs play a crucial role in preserving fundamental rights by enabling people to protest actions taken by the government that violate their rights. They play […]
[…] Keshvananda Bharati is a landmark case, and the Supreme Court’s ruling outlined the fundamental structure doctrine of the Constitution. In the case of Keshavananda Bharati, the bench rendered a decision that was both original and considerate. The 700-page judgment included a resolution for both Parliament’s right to amend laws and citizens’ right to preserve Fundamental Rights. […]
[…] Others is a milestone decision. Significant issues regarding the nexus between religious law and fundamental rights were highlighted by this case, especially with regard to divorce and […]
[…] others): The petitioners claimed that when women were subjected to sexual harassment at work, their fundamental rights—including the rights to equality, life, and personal liberty—were violated. They said that such […]
[…] forces, police forces, intelligence services, and comparable forces are allowed to have their fundamental rights restricted or abolished under Article 33 of the Constitution. The purpose of this clause is to […]
[…] justifications apply to them. As a result, the opponents claimed that while the Constitution grants fundamental rights, it also revokes them. To the point of suggesting that the chapter on fundamental rights be titled […]
[…] a list of rules and principles known as the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP). Like the Fundamental Rights (Part III of the Constitution), the DPSP do not have legal power, but they do give the government a […]
[…] of the Constitution, a contradiction has existed between the two due to the justiciability of Fundamental Rights and the non-justiciability of Directive Principles on the one hand, and the moral duty of State to […]
[…] This is because the duties listed in the Constitution as fundamental would be carried out by the people even if they were not included in the Constitution. They need to have been included after Part III in order to maintain parity with Fundamental Rights. […]
[…] warrant, mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, and habeas corpus in order to uphold the citizens’ fundamental rights as well as for any other reason. To enforce a regular legal right is meant by the phrase “for […]